Councillors vote to fight condos at OMB

Wide sidewalks, a three-storey look and open views of the Kew Beach fire hall – that’s how city councillors hope a revised zoning bylaw will shape any future development along Queen Street East from Coxwell Avenue to Nursewood Road.

But a legal test of the new rules is already underway.

Two developers who are separately proposing to build six-storey condos on either side of Woodbine Avenue at Queen have asked the Ontario Municipal Board to exempt their projects from the revised bylaw.

Just after voting in the bylaw changes at their April 9 meeting, councillors on the Toronto and East York Community Council followed up by voting to have city lawyers fight the two OMB appeals.

“We have the guidelines,” said Ward 32 councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon. “We’re going to darn well stand by them.”

That defence will centre partly on timing.

Speaking at the meeting, developer Karsten Riedel said that to be fair, his proposal should be weighed against the planning guidelines that were in place when he made it.

Riedel said that after months of talks with city staff, he stepped down his original proposal from an eight to a six-storey condo and was assured in October 2011 that it met city guidelines.

Riedel officially submitted that proposal in March 2012. It calls for a 29-unit condo at the northwest corner of Woodbine and Queen, a project he said is “nearly identical” to One Rainsford, a 28-unit condo that the city approved and which is currently under construction one block west on Queen.

As for complaints that his proposed condo for Woodbine and Queen did not meet previous guidelines calling for a gradual transition to buildings immediately north of it, Riedel said “By the way, immediately to the north is a 25-foot high brick wall.”

In a separate project, developer Robert Dragicevic is proposing to build a 70-unit, six-storey condo on the east side of Queen. Dragicevic’s proposal, which raised the issue of the view to the Kew Beach fire hall, was made in October of 2012.

McMahon says both proposals are out of line because councillors asked that all development applications be put on hold when they commissioned the Queen Street East Visioning Study in January of 2012.

“They were well aware of our request, and that we had council’s unanimous support for that,” she said.

Alan Burke, head of the East Beach Community Association, spoke in favour of opposing the two OMB appeals, which he said he will be watching closely.

“Woodbine and Queen is one of the major intersections of the Beach,” he said. “How often do the two corner lots come up for redevelopment at the same time? Probably it will be decades before that happens again.

“This is a real test case.”

Jan Hykamp, president of the Greater Beach Neighbourhood Association, said the group is “delighted” to see the new, more restrictive rules locked into the city’s standard zoning for Queen Street East, and he praised the Queen Street Visioning Study that led to those rules for including public input.

To close the meeting April 9, Councillor McMahon held up a copy of the new guidelines to make “a city-wide announcement.”

“Attention developers,” she said. “Here is the Beach Bible. Your homework assignment – please read it. If you’re not interested in it, there are other areas of the city I guess.”


Did you enjoy this article? If so, you may consider becoming a Voluntary Subscriber to the Beach Metro Community News and help us continue providing the community with more local content such as this. For over 40 years, our staff have worked hard to be the eyes and ears in your community, inform you of upcoming events, and let you know what and who’s making a difference. We cover the big stories as well as the little things that often matter the most. CLICK HERE to support Beach Metro News.

5 comments

What a waste of time , money and effort to fight the 200 Rainsford development. The City will lose at the OMB and there is no reason to fight terrific developments like this that will vastly improve the Queen Street strretscape.

Hey Joe,

What do you think about the 60 unit mega condo going up on Kippendavie? It’s only 400% larger than what the rules allow and will add even more traffic to this little side-street that already supports Kew Beach PS and daycare.

Sadly, you are right – now looking at the giant building on Kippendavie clearly there are no rules and the developers always win. This is hard to believe given our crack team of neighbourhood defenders centered around McMahon. Hey, what did she do before being a City Councillor? I suspect nothing, which would prepare her to have the slightest level of competence in combating well heeled developers and their army of legal experts. Next election, I suggest we vote in someone of substance not a former ESL teacher, “community organizer and environmentalist”. Better yet, McMahon please resign now before the Kippendavie precedent becomes the new beaches.

Wow! 60 units is a mega condo? Is it better or worse than the 50s style apartment blocks or the run down former cottages on Kippendavie or the townhouse developments that run off Kippendavie?

Regardless, if you think that a four story, 60 unit building is a mega condo, I suggest that you get out of the city fast. Measuring the size of a development against unrealistically restrictive and unenforceable zoning by-laws is just going to give you ulcers. BTW, I think that it is a terrific development that really adds something to our community.

Click here for our commenting guidelines.

Leave a Reply

*